Deployments · Digital Asset Canton applications · platform by Digital Asset
Société Générale tokenised collateral, repo and CoinVertible on Canton
Société Générale plans to accept certain tokenised assets as eligible collateral and to act as a repo counterparty on the Canton Network, using SG-FORGE's USD and EUR CoinVertible stablecoins for settlement and financing in permitted jurisdictions. It joined Canton as a Super Validator. It is also a member of the Canton Treasury financing working group.
AnnouncedProof of conceptPilotLive (limited)Live (scaled)
Announced since 13 May 2026[1] — Stated plans; no live repo or collateral transactions reported under this programme as of 2026-10-12. · Reviewed today
- Assets
- [1]Tokenised assets to be accepted as collateral; not specified
- Networks
- Use cases
- Repo[1]Collateral mobility[1]
- Jurisdictions
- France, United States
Participants
- Société GénéraleOperator, Counterparty, Cash leg provider[1]France
- Digital AssetPlatform provider, Technology provider[1]United States
- Societe Generale-FORGEIssuer, Cash leg provider[1]France
- Société Générale Prime Services clients, who would post tokenised collateral as margin; none named.[2]
Likely relevant regulation
- US federal banking agencies' framework for bank crypto-asset, stablecoin and tokenisation activitiesUnited States
- CFTC tokenised collateral and digital-asset margin framework (staff guidance and pilot programme)United States
Timeline
- Happened 13 May 2026 · Announcement · recorded 11 Oct 2026Société Générale sets out plans for tokenised collateral, repo and CoinVertible on Canton and becomes a Super Validator.[1]
Sources
- [1]Société Générale to scale tokenized finance and bring CoinVertible stablecoin solutions to Canton — SG-FORGE, 13 May 2026. Accessed 11 Oct 2026.B
- [2]Societe Generale to accept tokenized collateral, launch repo on Canton Network — Ledger Insights, 13 May 2026. Accessed 12 Oct 2026. Says the collateral would be taken as margin from Prime Services clients; no live figures..C
Spotted something out of date or missing? Suggest a correction, ideally with a source.