Frontier AdoptionEvidence-graded tracking of what's actually live

Deployments · UBS Tokenize · platform by UBS

UBS USD Money Market Investment Fund Token (uMINT)

UBS Asset Management's first tokenised fund, a US dollar money market strategy for Singapore-based investors with shares issued as tokens on Ethereum. It is sold through authorised distribution partners, starting with the DigiFT exchange. It remains small, at around $12 million on chain.

AnnouncedProof of conceptPilotLive (limited)Live (scaled)

Live (limited) since 1 Nov 2024[3] — Sold only through authorised distributors; about $12 million on chain and 39 holders in October 2026. · Reviewed today

Assets
Fund interest[2]
Tokenised shares of a sub-fund of UBS (SG) Global Opportunities VCC
Networks
Ethereum Public, permissionless[3]
Use cases
Primary issuance[1]Fund subscription and redemption[4]
Jurisdictions
Singapore

Participants

  • UBSPlatform provider, Issuer, Asset manager, Technology provider[3]Switzerland
  • DigiFTDistributor[4]Singapore
  • State StreetCustodian, Transfer agent or registrar, Fund administrator[2]United States
  • EYAuditor or reserve attestor[2]United Kingdom

Assets

Metrics

  • $12.26mAssets under management · as of 11 Oct 2026 · on Ethereum[1]
    On-chain via rwa.xyz; Ethereum is the only chain.
  • 39 holdersToken holders · as of 11 Oct 2026[1]
    On-chain via rwa.xyz.

Timeline

  1. Happened 1 Nov 2024 · Launch · recorded 11 Oct 2026
    UBS Asset Management launches uMINT on Ethereum under its UBS Tokenize service, with DigiFT as the first distributor.[3]

Sources

  1. [1]uMINT asset page — RWA.xyz. Accessed 11 Oct 2026.A
  2. [2]uMINT asset page (fund profile and service provider listing) — RWA.xyz. Accessed 11 Oct 2026.C
  3. [3]UBS Asset Management launches its first tokenized investment fund — UBS, 1 Nov 2024. Accessed 11 Oct 2026.B
  4. [4]UBS Asset Management launches its first tokenised Money Market Fund, available through DigiFT — DigiFT (via Cision / AAP), 2 Nov 2024. Accessed 11 Oct 2026.B

Spotted something out of date or missing? Suggest a correction, ideally with a source.